His agents also asked him questions and had him sign several documents, according to the letter. The FBI declined to comment, as did the US Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, where James was charged. James, 62, did not speak out against a law banning terrorist and violent attacks on public transport. Eisner-Grynberg wrote that neither she nor the other lawyers representing James had been informed in advance that the FBI had taken DNA samples. “Contrary to established practice, the government carried out this invasion without warning to a lawyer, depriving us of the opportunity to be heard or present. The government did not provide any further notice to a lawyer,” Eisner-Grynberg said in the letter. Eisner-Grynberg, who declined to comment on the letter, wrote that the lawyers had learned of what had happened to James and that they should ask the FBI for copies of what he had signed. Lawyers had received only one copy of the search warrant after it was conducted, according to Eisner-Grynberg. “It is the established practice in this Region when the government receives a search warrant for [oral] “After a representative, accused after the trial, the government informs the lawyer before his execution and offers the opportunity to be present”, he wrote in the letter. “This serves to safeguard the rights of the accused defendants. Here, because the government failed to notify the lawyer before interrogating and investigating Mr James, their practice risked violations of the fundamental constitutional rights of Mr Tz. , Fifth and Sixth Amendments “. Eisner-Greenberg requests any documents related to the search warrant, copies of what James signed and the sum and substance of the statements he made, according to the letter.
